Environmental Revolution

The Next Step big(p) Social Change Through Personal Commitment Introduction In the last thirty age, America has witnessed an environmental revolution. impertinently laws very(prenominal)(p) the 1963 wash Air Act and the 1974 Safe Drinking Water Act forge brisk ground in governmental environmentalism. Social phenomena the likes of landed estate Day, organized by Dennis Hayes in 1970, and the beginning of puffy-scale recycle, label by Oregons 1972 Bottle Bill, set around bene agentive role substitute the way Ameri dirty dogs weigh intimately the environment. As we approach the third millennium, however, we must(prenominal) re project our rush finish off on the planet and reflect on our efforts and progress towards a sustainable society.As global warming bewilders a scientific reality, natural disasters tiller monthly appearances in the headlines, and communities continue to find their ground- alter contaminated by industrial and thermonuclear excess, we mu st ask ourselves argon we doing enough? The environmental elbow grease in the past has gravidly been a neighborly and political phenomenon. plot of land many of us recycle (yet clam up wholly 35 sh be of us) and b play appear dead batteries to our townspeoplespeoples Hazardous Waste Day, more(prenominal) or less Ameri freighters gull non made the environment a personal issue.Very some of us mother taken the kind of personal life-changing steps that ar unavoidable to croak a penny an environment solelyy sustainable society. It is simply naive to believe that Americas relegate rates of exp terminationing, glom production, and environmental contamination atomic number 18 sustainable. The kind of social change h grayd washstand only happen when we as individuals drag in the effort in our all(prenominal)day lives. Only then ordain corporate America and the government realize that they too must change to cite their customer free radical and public support. This kind of personal load to change would also hold a new social ethic found on the environment under which populate and companies who do non attending for the earth would be held socially and financially responsible. In six parts, this hold forget re-examine our place in the environmental movement and analyze exactly what changes we can nettle in our personal lives to bring ab let out positive change. These beas atomic number 18 transportation, capability, recycle and go off management, toxins and pollution, food, and water. Some of the changes discussed will require sacrifice.But, overmuch important, these changes will often simplify our lives, bring our families and communities closer together, and help us to better understand, revere, and coexist with the world upon which individually of us is straightway dependent. Transportation The invention of the automobile is integrity of historys greatest environmental disasters. The automobile decentralized our soci ety. People with cable machines moved out of the city and drove to convey from their suburban homes. earlier the automobile, agriculture was topical anesthetic. Food was grown by farmers sustentation in what was soon to be the suburbs, and delivered fresh to food markets in the cities.Beca go for of the short surpass food had to travel, farmers didnt deal to add preservatives or separate additives to give freshness. Clearly, the automobile, like former(a) harmful inventions, makes our lives easier in many ways, but how often do we take up the environment when weighing these benefits? Fossil sacks account for the automobiles more or less profound feeling on the environment. Not only argon the emissions from cars and trucks deadly to both halo-brea intimacy organism, but each(prenominal) step of the dodo fuel process, from filiation to presidency, is bad for the environment.According to the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), megs of gallons of untre ated water contaminated by the drilling processes are dumped into waterways and oceans annually. Once extracted, fogy fuels are frequently refined on site, burying 179 billion tons of virulent neutralize annually. During transport, an average of 1 million gallons of oil is spilled into the ocean apiece month. Upon arrival, fossil fuels are usually burned in automobiles or agency plants. The average char-burning power plant burns about 10,000 tons of coal in a single day.With thus far a low infer of five per cent pay off, that vanishs 500 tons of toxic waste produced severally day by a single power plant. If employ in cars, oil must be refined further, wasting more postcode and creating more toxic waste forward movers bargain for it. The combustion engines subprogram in cars and trucks give tongue to toxic gases that impart to the greenhouse effect and paneling rain, deplete the oz unitary layer, and create more than 50% of the smog producing toxins that city-dwel lers breathe every day. level if we disregard the environmental damage caused by fossil fuels, we should signalize that, as a non-renewable power source, the earths reserves will eventually bombardment out. Hundreds of millions of years of extreme decomposition will be wiped out in a single century. Conservative estimates say we shoot 30 to 50 years left of oil use. With more and more developing nations apace increasing their use of fossil fuels, and the continuing growth rate of fossil fuel use at four condemnations the population growth, our time with fossil fuels could be importantly little.Just imagine the economic and political upheaval a major oil shortage would cause. Simply regurgitate, the rural that depends on fossil fuels the least will be the around believably to survive the economic strife and wars resulting from global depletion. Fossil fuel utilisation is deeply entrenched in the American mode of life. We rely on automobiles for almost all of our transpor tation assumes, enjoy motor boats and jet skis on our vacations, and use gas-burning engines in most of the tools we use in the yard. (Although galvanisingity is anformer(a)(prenominal) major consumer source of fossil fuel consumption, that will be discussed in the faculty section.Yet we can make numerous changes in our life style that will importantly decrease our personal consumption of fossil fuels. Lets harvest to Americas biggest weakness the automobile. Simply not driving is the top hat and most intelligible solution to the problem of automobiles. Americans have gotten used to their cars and seldom toss or bicycle even short distances. Gym class became a national official requirement in the 1930s because students were being driven or ride busses to school kind of of walking. Americans have also be dress of importly more overweight since we started driving.Consider your Saturday errands around town. most(prenominal) errands we make are to destinations less than a few miles away and frequently involve dropping off or picking up something olive-sized. These kinds of errands can further as easy be accomplished by walking or bicycling. Your body will thank you, and so will the environment. Public transport, if available, is also a great way to stay out of the car. Consider an areas public transportation organisation in choosing a place to live, as some cities have significantly better systems than others.When your destination is too far to walk or bicycle, in that location are still numerous ways to minimize the use of automobiles. If you drive to work, find other people at your company or other companies near you that live in your town and start a carpool. Even carpooling once in a while makes a difference, so dont get discouraged by occasional scheduling conflicts or other obstacles. When dis raise up errands, plan ahead to consolidate them into oneness trip and count the most efficient route. If possible, park in a central location a nd walk to multiple destinations.Ask a neighbor or friend if they postulate to go out (everybody has to go to the grocery store, for example), and share a ride. For every ride you share, the fuel consumption and emissions for that trip are cut in half. in that respect are also many ways that your driving habits effect the fuel efficiency of your car. Try to avoid fast accelerations, for instance. They use significantly more fuel than gradual accelerations. Likewise, avoid driving at overweening speeds. Every car engine has an RPM (revolutions per minute) at which optimal fuel economy is contactd youll find it in your cars manual.Check your tachometer and try to maintain that RPM while driving. Minimizing the work-load on your car is another way to join on fuel economy. Remove any unnecessary heavy objects from the car, and avoid utilise the diffuse conditioner when possible. Finally, turn off your engine if you expect to be slog for even a short while. Starting a modern fuel -injected car uses less gas than idling for 30 seconds. Did you know that warming up your car by letting it idle in the driveway in cold weather actually causes engine damage? This is also when your cars emissions are at their worst.The best and fastest way to heat up a car is by driving it. When its time to buy a new car, there are many bionomic alternatives to the gas guzzling beasts regular(prenominal)ly driven by Americans. Many compact cars on the market straight off achieve stunning fuel economy. The four-wheel-drive trucks so popular in todays market get comparatively bad gas mileage and usually go one person over a paved road. Buy the smallest car you can, and dont buy a larger car for infrequent needs- librate buying a used trailer for infrequent cargo hauls.If youve been putting off the purchase of a motorcycle as whimsical, think over again. Many motorcycles (and scooters in particular) achieve significantly better fuel economy compared to even the most fuel-efficient cars, resulting in less over-all consumption and emissions. Maintenance is the final step in minimizing the environmental impact of automobiles. Modern cars have very sophisticated emissions systems and engines that must be finely tuned to achieve maximum efficiency. Regular check-ups for your car will nourish your investment and ensure the car is in its best possible operative order.The long-run you hold in your car, the more value from it you receive and the less waste is created and brawn spent in the production of a new car. If you have to commute to work every day, consider an galvanic car car. Electric cars have come a long way in price, distance and efficiency, and will soon be available from large manufacturers like Ford and Toyota. some(prenominal) small companies around the country convert small gas power cars and trucks to electric, zero-emissions vehicles and sell them for slightly more than a gas-powered car. As electric cars become more common and are manufact ured on a large scale, their prices will drop significantly.Many hobbyists, with no prior automotive or electrical expertise, have created their own electric cars from their used gas-powered vehicles. Check your local anaesthetic subroutine library for one of the many conversion guides available. Todays electric cars take about four hours to charge, plugged into a streamer outlet, and can go anyplace from 50 to 200 miles on a single charge. While you wouldnt necessitate to take an electric car across the country (though this has been done), their distance per charge is plenty for a emblematic commuter to get to work and back.Most electric car owners bread and butter a gas-powered car around for longer trips. Owners of electric cars generally find the increase in their electric post horse minimal compared to the metre they save in gasoline. While electric cars create no emissions themselves, and create almost no waste (even the batteries are useful), the electric company is still burning fossil fuels to create the electricity unavoidable to charge the car. Nevertheless, electric companies are capable of converting fossil fuels to zip much more efficiently and with fewer emissions than a gas-powered car.Electric cars also leave room for improvement in any method of large-scale energy production, such as biomass, hydro, and solar (see the susceptibility section). This section has focused chiefly on cars, but Americans also use many other gas-powered engines. The small engines in motor boats and lawn equipment do not have to meet the emissions standards of cars, and thus, emit far more toxins into the subscriber line. Consider using a quiet, powerless mulching lawn mower on your lawn if you have one, and an electric weed whacker rather than one that is gas powered. If you enjoy the water, consider learning to sail rather than motoring. mechanized water vehicles not only emit style pollution, they also maculate the water, contribute to sound poll ution, and injure fish and other animals in the water. Energy in the Home Automobiles are not the only consumers of fossil fuels or sources of air pollution stemming from our personal lives. According to the EPA, furnaces, hot water heaters, and other fossil fuel burning appliances in American homes produce 20% of all U. S. carbon dioxide, 26% of sulfur dioxide, and 15% of nitrogen oxide emissions, the tip causes of acid rain and global warming.Note that these figures do not take into consideration the power our homes draw from fossil fuel-burning power plants. By do our homes as energy-efficient as possible and minimizing our personal use of electricity, we can significantly reduce our personal impact on the environment. The main sources of power consumption in our homes are the estrus, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. Maintaining, animizeing, or upgrading these systems will not only save us money, but also reduce the fare of energy needed to run our homes on a day-to-day basis.The EPAs Energy Star Homes program brings environmentally aware developers and manufacturers together to configuration homes that are better insulated and utilize 90% efficiency or better HVAC systems. If you are looking to build a new home, call their toll-free hotline, (888) STAR-YES, for literature, or save report and visit their Internet site at www. epa. gov for more information. Unfortunately, building new homes is not an environmentally sound thing to do. New homes require previously undeveloped land or disposal of the propertys old turn of events.Further, new timber and materials must be used unless costly measures are taken to restore materials from an old construction. Beyond environmentally unsound, new construction is many times more expensive and time-consuming than renovation and repair of most existing houses. Even if your house is too costly to upgrade, consider buying an al sayy renovated house or one easily renovated before building new const ruction. A furnace using heating oil, natural gas, or electricity heats most American homes. Still others use a wood or pellet stove.Of these, electricity is by far the least efficient. integrity truth of energy conservation is that electricity should not be used to produce heat, whether in a stove, water heater, or central heating. The exclusion to this is the microwave, which is the most efficient way to heat small amounts of food. Edward Harlands book, ECORENOVATION the ecological home improvement guide, an clarified resource for anyone interested in environmental renovations, provides this revealing chart Fuel Kg of CO2 Emitted per Useful kilowatt Delivered (approx. ) Gas 0. 7 Oil 0. 5 Coal 0. 40 electricity 0. 83 As you can see, electricity is more than twice as polluting as a coal burning furnace.Electricity is even worse if you take into consideration the amount of energy created by nuclear power, which creates nuclear waste kind of of carbon dioxide (CO2). There is al so a significant amount of energy wasted in cooling power plants and bemused in the power grid, which further degrades electricitys viability as an environmentally sound energy source. As the chart shows, natural gas, or methane, is the cleanest burning fuel.While most of the natural gas used in America is drawn from non-renewable reserves, it can be produced renewably through biomass production, a method currently used by China. Methane is produced in massive quantities by decaying waste and agricultural operations, so much that methane is one of the most serious greenhouse gasses. If methane could be captured from these sources, we would be fall the greenhouse effect and using clean-burning renewable fuel at the same time. For these reasons, if you have an aging or uneffective oil burning furnace, consider converting to an efficient natural gas furnace.Wood or pellet stoves still fuel many homes in America. Wood, if used wisely, is a renewable and relatively clean-burning fuel . While burning wood does produce CO and CO2, new engine room captures wood stoves to reuse unspent output by re-burning it before emission. shooting stoves, quickly replacing log-burning stoves, use pressed recycled paper and wood cornmeal mush that look like rabbit pellets. Pellets, while more expensive, are more efficient to burn and take up less space during storage. Before investing in a wood stove, however, be sure to check up on which brands are most efficient and emit the least gases and particulate.Also, wood stoves must be used vexfully and maintained properly to avoid inefficient operation, excessive emissions, and leakage of carbon monoxide into the home. The best way to minimize the amount of fuel-produced heat your home requires is to insulate it properly. Insulation is the most important factor in the amount of energy required to heat your home. Consider a hypothetical home with 100% perfect insulant. This home would need to be heated only once, and never agai n. This puts into perspective the idea that we only need to heat our homes as much as heat escapes to the outside.Most houses in America are poorly insulated at best only one in four houses have insulated walls. Consider the fuel savings if you change magnitude your homes insulation quality by even 20%, which in many cases is a realistic goal. Initially, insulation costs time and money, but it pays for itself quickly in reduced fuel costs and a warmer, more leisurely home. Unfortunately, the finer points of insulating a home are beyond the scope of this article. An excellent resource on maximizing your homes insulation is Home Insulation by Harry Yost.Your local library should have, if not this book, several(prenominal) books on insulation that will at least get you started. Beyond updating your furnace and insulating your home, consider your personal use of heat in the home. The average American households temperature during the winter is slowly rising because of increasingly sed entary lifestyles and lighter dress. The healthier we eat and the more performance we get, the more internal heat our bodies will produce. The more above the outside temperature a home is heated, the less efficient its heating system becomes.If we simply wear more clothes, we will need well less heat. Wearing sweaters and slippers, eating nutritious food, and getting plenty of exercise are simple but frequently overlooked ways we can reduce our heating energy needs. Next to furnaces and stoves, the air conditioner is the second most energy-hungry appliance in American homes. Unfortunately, air conditioners rely on loads of electricity, the most polluting form of energy available. The use of air conditioners should be avoided at all costs.If you live in a climate with extreme heat, consider your air conditioner and its placement carefully. The EPA has outlined efficiency standards for most household appliances, air conditioners included. Make sure, if you buy an air conditioner, t hat it has the EPAs Energy Star mark of approval. This does not mean that the air conditioner is good for the environment, but that it uses its electricity efficiently instead of wasting it as many older models do. If you must have an air conditioner, purchase a small, efficient model and place it in a small, closed-off room where you spend most of your time.Make sure this room does not contain any heat-producing appliances like a washing machine or clothes dryer, and that sunlight does not enter through windows. Under these conditions, air conditioning can be relatively efficient and economical. Central air conditioning, on the other hand, is extremely inefficient and usually goes largely unused. immaterial of heating and air conditioning, almost all of the energy used in our homes is electricity. Many Americans take electricity for granted, leaving unused lights and appliances on without thinking. A simple awareness in turning things off can greatly reduce our electric bills.Furt her, choices can be made in the kinds of lights and appliances we use, and whether they need to be used at all. As for lights, there are several high-efficiency bulbs on the market that, for slightly more money than a typical light bulb, can get by on a subdivision of the electricity. Fluorescent lights, for instance, are five times more efficient than light (typical) lights. Standard incandescent light bulbs use electricity to heat a filament that glows to create light, whereas fluorescent lights send very rapid and skeleton charges of electricity through a filament.The days of flappinging long underground fluorescent lights are over. According to Edward Harland, new Compact Fluorescent Lights (CFLs) flicker at more than 20,000 cycles per second (compared to 60 in tube lights), are 30% more energy efficient than tube lights, and come on almost instantly. These lights, while more expensive, will significantly reduce your electricity bill and last five to ten times longer than s tandard light bulbs. Before even turning on the lights, make the best possible use of natural light in your home. Place your denotation chair by a sunny window instead of in a corner facing out a window.Consider adding skylights to your home. These can create a surprising amount of natural light during the day, and contribute to your houses heat during the winter. Mirrors strategically placed on walls can also make better use of light and heat from the sun coming in through the windows. Use only what electric lighting is necessary low-wattage delegate lights for individual applications instead of high power lights to illuminate a large area. If you must use outdoor lights, consider purchasing a effort detector that will turn the light on and off only when it senses movement.When purchasing appliances, check to see that they are EPA Energy Star approved. These appliances use energy more efficiently than others. Most refrigerators, for instance, have compressors at their base which produce significant heat and cause the refrigerator to work against itself. During equitable weather, consider drying clothes on a line outside instead of using a dryer, which inefficiently uses electricity to heat cold wet clothes. Your clothes will last longer, and youll see the difference in your electric bill. When undressing at night, ask yourself whether your pants can be worn again before washing.Americans, in particular, tend to balk at this sort of a suggestion. Allowing ourselves to think logically beyond social qualms and customs will allow each of our personal environmental movements to transcend many of our unsustainable habits. If you work in an office or at home, chances are your clothes arent that dirty at the end of the day. Youll be surprised at the decrease in your weekly laundry load. The last big source of energy consumption in our homes is our favorite appliance of all. The average American household telly is on 7 hours and 20 minutes per day, and 98% of al l households have at least one television.At 170 watts per hour, that comes to 452,965 watt hours (or 453 kilowatt hours) of television use per year in an average household using one 25 television. Look at the breakdown of your electricity bill to put this number into perspective. Youll see that America could save a lot of electricity and money by simply turning off the television. Instead, we can read a book, go for a walk or hike, work in a garden, or talk or play a feisty with our families. Quite simply, the less television we watch, the richer our lives will be, the less we will spend on electricity, and the more we will be doing for the environment.All of the information in this section has focussed on minimizing the use of energy in the home. mean if you could use electricity in your home without burning any fossil fuels and without any monthly electric bills. This is not only possible, but a reality for thousands of Americans. With one initial investment in a photovoltaic s ystem (silicon cells that convert the suns light into electricity), you can end your dependence on polluting power companies and begin a new life of clean energy self-sufficiency.You can get started with a simple photovoltaic setup for a single zone of your home for less than one thousand dollars, or go all out with a top-of-the-line fully self-sufficient photovoltaic power center for about $13,000. If these prices sound high, consider the savings. If your monthly electric bill is $100, a top-of-the-line system that requires only a moderate degree of energy efficiency would be paid for in less than 11 years. And there is a whole spectrum of bodaciouser systems that can easily power a typical home.For less than four thousand dollars (paying for itself in about 3 years) the Real Goods Trading Corporation sells a system designed to wait all the lighting, entertainment, and small kitchen appliances for a modest, energy-conserving household of one to four people in a full-time home. This description is taken from the Real Goods solar Living Source Book, 9th Edition. This seven hundred page tome covers everything from taking care of the land to water conservation and every alternative form of energy from solar to hydro to wind.It is a must-have for anyone who wants to live lightly on the earth, and is available at most major book stores and libraries. Recycling and Waste Management There is no environmentally sound method of dealing with the 200 million tons of municipal solid waste produced in America each year. There are many things we can do, however, to minimize, if not eliminate, our personal 4 1/2lb-a-day contribution to that figure. The now ubiquitous threesome, Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle, still defines what we all must do to bring our personal trash production down to a sustainable level.With the media and certain high-positioned nay-sayers claiming that recycling is worse for the environment than it is good for it, and laws devising recycling still a nother stupid rule rather than a social imperative, perhaps a redux of Americas trash situation is called for. Households and other residences produce 100 of the 200 million tons of annually produced refuse in the United States. Most of that goes to land-fills, where it is covered up (if not purposefully sealed to prevent leakage) and starved of the oxygen needed for biodegradation.Here is just a taste of some slobber statistics from Geoffrey C. Saigns well-researched book, Green Essentials More than 1/2 of U. S. landfills have closed in the past 10 years, and approximately 1/2 of the remain 5,800 landfills do not meet federal or state standards for human health and environmental protection. More landfills are being closed as they fail to meet 1993 and 1994 guidelines and as communities place upright allowing new landfills in their area 22 states will run out of landfill capacity at bottom 10 years or less. The nations 10 largest cities use a land area for their toss that is larger than the state of Indiana.And this is just landfills. Incineration is quickly becoming the chosen method of dealing with garbage. Incineration actually concentrates the toxicity of garbage by mixing volatile chemicals at high temperatures and minify its harmless biomass content. Approximately 1/4 of the ashes produced in a typical incinerator escape into the atmosphere, where they combine with the toxic gases emitted to cause acid rain, smog, and global warming. The remaining ashes are highly toxic and dumped in landfills or stored in toxic waste facilities.A few states mix this ash with pavement, where it will slowly decompose and leach into the ground. The simple fact is that most of this waste could be recycled or composted instead of burned or buried. Green Essentials offers this breakdown of garbage ingredients by weight Ingredient % by weight Alternative disposal methods available Paper and paperboard 34% Recyclable Yard trimmings 20% Compostable Plastic 9% Recyclab le Food waste 9% Compostable Metals 8% Recyclable Glass 7% Recyclable Wood 4% Compostable, can be used as fuel Rubber and strap 3% Recyclable (tires) Textiles 2% Donate Other 4%As this chart displays, 58% (not counting the 3% for rubber and leather) of our garbage is recyclable 33% of the remainder could be composted. That means that 91% of all the garbage produced in this country (thats about 182 million tons annually) could be kept out of incinerators and landfills. Even a fraction of this ideal estimate would have a profound impact on the environment. Despite the amazing say-so for waste reduction that recycling makes possible, The New York Times joined the medias misinformed recycling myth extravaganza in their June 30th, 1996 article, Recycling is Garbage.From the beginning, pessimists and special-interest industries have spread improper myths about recycling. These claims frequently charge (among other things) that landfill space is abundant and cheap there is no market fo r recycled goods and recycling doesnt pay for itself. Consider the facts on these three points Landfill space has become a precious commodity in the U. S. , with many states paying to export trash to other states or countries. give back Geoffrey Saigns statement that 22 states will run out of landfill capacity within 10 years or less.The market for recycled goods, while fluctuating like any burgeoning market, has increased with the amount of recycled goods available to create a the right way new industry. According to the Environmental Defense Fund, U. S. pulp paper manufacturers have voluntarily built or expanded more than 45 recycled paper mills in the 1990s, and are projected to spend more than $10 billion on such facilities by the end of the decade. To argue that recycling doesnt pay for itself is like arguing that landfills and incinerators dont pay for themselves-of course they dont.Recycling plants, even in the industrys infancy, cost about as much to operate as convention al disposal methods, but are considerably more environmentally sound (costing less when environmental damage and cleanup costs are considered) and reduce pollution from manufacturing and mining for new production. Recycling is an easy thing to do, and good habit to get into as many towns and cities are requiring their citizens to recycle by law or charging by the pound for non-recycled garbage.First, find out what your town recycles by calling your local waste management facility. If your town or city doesnt recycle or recycles only a few materials, consider getting a recycling-only dump permit for a near-by pro-recycling town or city. Next, reorganize your homes main trash area to include receptacles for all the different materials you will recycle. Food containers like tin cans and bottles should be rinsed to keep your recycling receptacles from smelling.Youll be amazed at the decrease in waste the next time you take out the trash. If we make a commitment to recycle our garbage, w e must support the effort on the other end by buying recycled goods. Many products packaging claims 100% recyclable. This is good, but keep in mind that it doesnt mean the material is recycled. Look for the percentage of post-consumer waste to tell you if it is and how much of is recycled. Recycled products like paper and cardboard have come a long way in quality and price.Seventh Generation, a producer of a full line of 100% recycled and earth-friendly household products, posts a convincing advertisement on the side of their bathroom tissue packages If every household in the U. S. eplaced just one 4-pack of 430 sheet virgin quality bathroom tissues with 100% recycled ones, we could save 1 million trees, 4. 1 million cubic feet of landfill space (equal to 4,618 full garbage trucks), and 427 million gallons of water (a years supply for 12,300 families of four). About 33% of the garbage we produce, like food scraps and yard trimmings, can be composted.Composting is natures answer to garbage control, converting organic waste back into the soil it came from. While many people compost to create nutrient-rich soil for their garden, you dont have to be a gardener to compost your organic waste. You should cover your compost pile, but not suffocate it. The organic waste needs plenty of oxygen to feed the microbes that decompose the matter. You can build a box for your compost, or buy one pre-made at your local garden shop. Look for an organic gardening book at your library for instructions on building a