Modern Racism Essay

An Asian adorer once had experienced racism while he was out in a fast nourishment restaurant in the city. He divided up how he was the third person in line at the time, simply when it was his turn to frame his food, the food attendant, who was a 20-something white man, simply blew him turned and serviced the person next in line to him. He said that his attempts to introduce his right to order fell to deaf ears for a while, until the attendant exclaimed, Whites first off. Youre Asian. Of course, he felt shock and embarrassment at the time the racism incident happened.He menti superstard he couldnt believe that racism is belt up prevalent up to this day. Though the said incident may be an isolated case, it close up is alarming that these things still happen. Clearly, racism still isnt a thing of the past, rather, it still lingers on to the present day, hence, the term, Modern Racism. wizard of the laudable explanations on prejudice that explains the food attendants militar y strength towards my Asian friend is the concept of In-Group Bias. This concept states that homos have a powerful tendency to favor over other stems the group to which they survive (Bordens & deoxyadenosine monophosphate Horowitz, 2002).True enough, the food attendant chose to give his services to whites first because they have the same color, implying they belong in the same group, and tended to entirely ignore his Asian customer because he is not white. If one mustiness find justification to what the food attendant did, then one raise only assume that because the country is at present extremely racial and multicultural, people tend to hold tightly to those in the same group as they are, because only then they can feel safest and strongest.This is due to the supposal that the other parts of the group will also tend to value him/her more than other members of the outgroup, in the event of a conflict. This is explained in the Social identicalness Theory, an underlying theo ry to explain In-Group Bias. The Social Identity Theory explains that human beings are motivated to controllingly evaluate their own groups, in order to maintain and enhance self-esteem (Tafjel, 1982). When a person derogates a member of the outgroup, it enhances the ingroup and in turn, promotes positive self-evaluation (Schneider, 2004. )The racist remark and deed of the food attendant aims to please his group, which are the white people, and this event gives a positive effect on his self-evaluation. The food attendants hostility towards my Asian friend may also be explained by the Scapegoating Theory. This theory states that frustration is a major instigation of aggression, and when this cant be enjoin at the direct cause, it may be displaced onto a scapegoat (Dollard, Miller, Doob, Mowrer, & Sears, 1939).In this event, the frustration of the food attendant is from his economic spatial relation, and because he is jeopardize that an outgroup, who in this case is my Asian fr iend, has a better economic status than he is, he displaced his anger and aggression by making a racist remark and deed against my Asian friend. Now, whether it is Ingroup Bias or Scapegoating Theory which explains the racist deed best, it cannot be justified that the deed was through in good taste. Of course, racism is what it entails, it is an unjust means of categorizing people, and yet it still prevails in the modern times.Unfortunately, there is no foolproof way that one can prevent racism from happening. The next best thing to rescind conflict that results from stereotyping and modern racism is to keep an open mind. References Schneider, D. J. (2004). The Psychology of Stereotyping. brisk York The Guilford Press. Bordens, K. S. and Horowitz. (2002). Social Psychology. New Jersey Lawrence Elbaum Associates Inc. Fisher, E. M. (1992). Modern Racism and Academic Librarianship in a Period of Diversity. Conference Proceedings, Sixth National Conference. Chicago, IL affiliation o f College & Research Libraries.