Diversity and Multiculturalism Essay

Minority is a word describing a conclave representing a population sm al wholenesser than the State. They atomic number 18 people of distinct finishing, religion, manner of speaking and paganity from the norms of the Society. Any assembly resembling the stated characteristics is a Minority. This description clearly emphasizes the disprover of Human Rights to people who are non living within the standards of the society. concourse Rights or Minority Rights, in a popular manner, speaks of the friendly un kindredness to some and a due right to others. Moreover, a conflict begins when an several(prenominal) holds of his/her minority grouping and yet, the State does non recognize a Minority.The group rights tend to protect a certain group and reflects the other laws excluded on their existence, which for many mortals is a direct inconsistency. Primarily, rights are powers to act in accord with the existing system having fosters and article of beliefs approved by t he society. It is a claim or title, whether legal, descriptive and moral (Sutton, 2001). The controversy exists regarding group rights on the terminal c all(prenominal)ed Multi paganism. This kind of group right often pertains to a member of an heathenish or religious group.Scholars perceive this kind of group right as a barrier to the fulfils that most ethnic groups take over before in that location was civilization. It is a systema skeletale of oppression because the majority opposes those traditional beliefs and pursues the so-called comparability to much(prenominal)(prenominal) people. aggroup rights exist to discriminate, oppose and eliminate the traditional acts for the gladness of the majority. MULTICULTURALISM Multiculturalism is the opinion that all cultures, from tribesmen and modern civilization, to be equal. However, equating does not wrap up the century old problem because of diverse conditions. Thus, multiculturalism confers with egalitarianism.The objec tive of multiculturalism is to obliterate the value of free, industrialized civilization, by declaring such civilization no better than the earthy tribalism. It wants to incapacitate the minds ability to enjoin good from evil, to contrastiveiate life promoting to what life is negating. Some oppose this principle because they understanding out(a) that everyone has a right to moral judgment. The ideas and culture of a specific connection should have recognition and take to be. ISSUES ON MULTICULTURALISM umpteen question how the persons would respect such minority rights if the problem remains on cultural differences.The railway line of the multiculturalists detainers is that all cultures are equal and some factors climax from this culture are outstanding to the universal value. Some fruits of Enlightenment and egalitarian movements root from the cultural proponents. dark ethnic attire and kindle cuisine may seem interesting and attractive. Nevertheless, with the verity of women and childrens oppression gentlemanwide, multiculturalism is increasingly a policy to handle that oppression (Kamguian, 2005). The crimes against women become the celebration of traditional cultures and religions with the ignorance on it disadvantages.Governments of Western andtocks utilized the policy of multiculturalism in the past, which encourage and uphold the demands for group rights coming from native populations, ethnic minorities or religious groups. However, these cultures have societal cultures that wage members of meaningful ways of life across the full range of military man activities, including social, educational, religious, and recreational life. Because these societal cultures play an essential role in the lives of members and because these cultures organisation extinction, they should have special rights for protection.This accord with group rights but that is not the vitrine with the societal norms like slavery, female genital mutilation, gistd m arriages, honor killing and other horrors respected by the society. These horrible practices are within the multicultural principle but it the proper action is to eradicate it. The reason begins with multiculturalism, which acts as a substitute policy to ensure a tolerant and democratized meekness in a world that conflicts between cultures eradicate such values. Moreover, the argument leads to racism and tyranny, as the dominant group want to create a universal norm.Another argument consists of the benignant basic need for cultural attachments. This need then should have protection from validating and protecting different cultures. The supporters of multiculturalism contrast that individual rights is sufficient enough for protection of minority cultures or their way of life that has a consequence of having special group rights and privileges such as arbitrations from Sharia in Canada and allowances fro polygamous men in France. In other cases, group rights claim to have politica l exclusions, govern their principles and apologize them from the general law.Often, cultures are patriarchal and many cultures claim group rights are more patriarchal than the surrounding cultures. Ex angstromles are the common gender inequalities like child marriages, forced marriages, divorce systems biased against women, polygamy and clitoridoctomy. These cases violate women and childrens individual rights of the society. This respect for cultural traditions resulted to lack of support and voices for women and children and the marginalization of progressive forces. When one conserves the culture of these minority groups, they would see how oppression and repression reside within their sustain communities.Not all cultures are equal scour though forgiving race possess culture, some may be better that the other cultures and others may possess values unacceptable to the society. Indeed the very idea of equality is the product of the Enlightenment and the political and intellec tual revolutions that it unleashed (Kamguian, 2005). Forcing equality means to repugn accepted practices and believing in possibility of transformation. However, permitting the differences by the dominant culture is the acceptance of the society as a whole. The conversion movement is not imparting knowledge to students, but promoting racism. Michael S. Berliner Racism is a notion directional one race as superior to some other race. The affirmative action viewed by some is a form of ethnic potpourri, a form of politically correct disguise. The belief of racism is that ones convictions, values and character is particularly based on anatomy or rake and not by judgment. This view tends to see people of different pigmentation as different from the superior pigmentation. The spread of racism causes destruction of the individual in ones mind. This individual then clings to another race, wanting to have that belongingness because of race diversity.Proponents of diversity seem to be th e true racists because they see the world through the color of lens, hair and skin. To multiculturalists, values, thinking and human identity all cling to race. Multiculturalism establishes the oppression in equality. Proponents of diversity teach the youth that people having different cultures also have different capacities resulting to recognition of separatism and glorifying a specific race. This revolutionizes racial identity that aims to erect an unbridgeable perception on race differences.Hence, any cooperation between races is impossible because of their differences existence emphasized. ETHNICITY AND GROUP RIGHTS The heathenish Group has group rights that defend their members who want to exercise their right to exonerate and enables them to act diversely from the majority. The ethnic group supports their group rights and their representatives, subsequently. It is unnecessary and inapplicable to put these rights in a metaphysical entity, which bear their independent human characteristics. In addition, the right in question resorts to be a negatively charged claim. The majority should not forbid such groups to defend their rights.In fact, for the reason that they have the utmost power in defense team, they should assist the minority to respect and bear the minority rights in a positive way. However, this can harbor to a situation where the ethnic group does a solemn bumble not prevented by the existing rules and regulations. Another is that the ethnic group should observe the group rights, voluntarily and autonomously. People cannot defend a right not chosen by them. Sutton defines that in order to enact such rights they must(prenominal) show the capacity to understand to successful claimants (Sutton, 2001, p 21).The ethnic group rights should correspond with the human rights, as it would give them the right to protect such liberties whenever the majority, which also has human rights, opposes their ethnic habits. Nonetheless, the civil liberty o f individuals and ethnic group rights come from the principle of prima facie rights, which explains the liberty experienced by the ethnic group due to these rights has limitations whenever the ethnic habits impose grave suffering or serious restrictions of liberty on other human beings.In general, the indebtedness of the majority has a craft not to restrict freedom when they coveting to observe harmless habits and if the majoritys opposition puts a grave suffering to the ethnic group, then, they have to restrict such opposition (Hayry, 2007). Ethnic minorities do not have a group right to force or coerce their members into observing duties, which are not required by the principles of liberty and the avoidance of suffering (Hayry, 2007).Individuals have three duties, the handicraft not to inflict harm to another individual, the calling not to restrict immoderately the freedom of others and the duty not to breach voluntary, harmless contracts. The first duty means for the individ uals to act accordingly to the rule of the group without coercing such right. The argument then is the term ethnic group coerces their right because they did not have the term themselves but a group will not defend a right not made by them. Hence, the general synthesis is to coerce such freedom, which they themselves have not freely assumed.The aid duty restricts any enforcement of freedom, which proves to be unnecessary to the ethnic group. The majority would see that being a member of a minority group would enforce the second duty that is false in belief that will alter the norms. Conversely, everyone has the duty to restrict or condemn habits that will impose suffering and untenable restrictions of freedom. In general, the second argument gives the majority the right to restrict ethnic habits given that it will impose harm to the society but it should outdistance the principles of equality and fairness.Most of the majority will regard the thesis of defense concerning ethnic habits, which they find different from the norms, false. This is natural, as the dominant groups want a homogenous society supplying the best foundation for human flourishing, even if it costs the principle of liberty and avoidance of suffering. Nonetheless, the significant patterns that endow social conformity should have actions in eliminating cultural diversity (Hayry, 2007). INDIVIDUALISM VERSUS MULTICULTURALISM The principle on individualism is the individual as the primary unit of reality and the ultimate preference of value.Contrary to what other opinions say, individualism does not disclaim the existence of a society rather the society as a group of individuals not above those individuals. Individualism sees every person as the end of himself and there should be no sacrifice of an individual for another (Stata, 1992). The achievement of an individual credits for himself/herself and not based on the achievements of others. level off though the society believes of individua lism as isolation, it does not deny the cooperation but is a theory of the conditions living and working with other people as beneficial.In general, individualism gives credit to an individual and not on the individuals membership with a society. The probable cure for racial differences is individualism or seeing the person not because of his/her race but because of his/her abilities. The diversity movement aims to teach the chase diversity awareness, diversity training, diversity hiring and submissions and diversity accommodations, which all refer to racial preference. The proper dose on racial issues is to appreciate individually and treatment of collective merits (Locke, 2000). CONCLUSIONProtection of human rights in various fields becomes depressing in the past century. Many have resulted to war, as they protect their community from discrimination and sustenance of group rights. Before group rights, many institutions protected the safety of minorities. Three major periods exist ed in favor of minority group rights. The first period appeared in a non-systematic protection comprising mainly of incorporation of protective clauses, particularly in favor of religious minorities. The second period existed after World contend I within the framework of the League of Nations.Lastly are the developments following World War II (Lerner, 2003) on group rights. With all these developments in minorities and group rights, still the existing truth on racial discrimination is emerging. Many say of diversity as an act of racism, that employing group rights does not prove to be efficient in eradicating discrimination. Briefly, group rights is not a power rather a suppression, racial diversity and oppression secrecy in equality.ReferencesBerliner, M. Diversity and Multiculturalism. 24 May 2000 14 November 2007 <http//www.aynrand. org/ put/News2? JServSessionIdr009=rpsx4ci8k4. app7a&page=NewsArticle&id=5195&news_iv_ctrl=1076> Sutton, P. Kinds of Rights in Country Recognising Customary Rights as Incidents of Native Title. 2001. 14 November 2007 p. 29 National Native Title Tribunal. Hayry, H. Ethnicity and Group Rights, Individual Liberties and Immoral Obligations. 14 November 2007 <http//www. bu. edu/wcp/Papers/Soci/SociHayr. htm> Minority. 14 November 2007 <http//www. terralingua. org/Definitions/DMinority. html> Kamguian, A. frequent Rights versus Individual Rights. 6 July 2005 14 November 2007 <http//www. iheu. org/node/1691> Culture and Multiculturalism. 14 November 2007 <http//www. aynrand. org/ settle/PageServer? pagename=media_topic_multiculturalism> Locke, E. Individualism The Only Cure for Racism. 12 December 1997 14 November 2007 <http//www. aynrand. org/site/News2? JServSessionIdr009=rpsx4ci8k4. app7a&page=NewsArticle&id=6167&news_iv_ctrl=1076> Lerner, N. Group Rights and Discrimination in International Law. Boston Martinus Nihjoff Publishers, 2003.