Full Metal Jacket vs the Things They Carried Essay

Im going to show you a short clip from the mental picture Full Metal Jacket directed by Stanley Kubart, the guy Mr. MacBrides brother mentioned yesterday in the LMC. In this scene, this group of American soldiers fin whollyy found and wounded the sniper that had already killed 3 of their men. One of which is Jokers, the heros, best friend, Cowboy.In the scene we good watched, the sniper was wounded, and Baldwin precious to leave the sniper to rot, moreover Joker kills her instead. This leads the audience wonder Did Joker kill her because he precious to end her misery, or did he kill her out of frustration and as way of revenge for his friend, Cowboy? The significance isnt in the answer, just now in the question itself. The fact that this movie makes you doubt Jokers motives shows that this is a professedly struggle story. There is no moral in Full Metal Jacket.There are no good guys and perverting guys, and there isnt a clear commercial enterprise drawn amidst justice and evil. You dont smack hatred towards the Viet Cong sniper, and you dont have undying support the American soldiers. Its different from all the other clich, patriotic war movies. Like Tim OBrien writes A true war story is never moral. It does not instruct, nor encourage virtue, nor suggest models of suitable human behavior, nor restrain men from doing the things men have always done. If a story seems moral, do not believe it. If at the end of a war story you feel uplifted, or if you feel that some refined bit of rectitude has been salvaged from the larger waste, then you have been made the dupe of a very old and terrible lie.No one would make out what Joker did was a model of proper human behavior, because no one knows if he killed the sniper out of sympathy or to fulfill his lustfulness for vengeance. Baldwin wanted to do what men have always done he wanted to let the sniper feel the amount of pain and sorrow he feels he wanted her to die a slow, painful death, he wanted revenge . The ending doesnt uplift you, and the situation the soldiers were in allowed no rectitude. all(a) these factors integrated create a masterpiece to what OBrien would proudly address as a true war story.The Things They Carried is ironic in a way that it tells you how to tell a true war story, but the allegory itself is a do of fiction. However, this doesnt mean the stories themselves arent realistic they are, as OBrien would say, the story virtue. Sometimes the story truth is truer than the happening truth, because it makes things feel present. Reading this book makes the reader feel confused, and even cheated, because by creating a fictional protagonist called Tim OBrien, a soldier who fought in the Vietnam War, the author, Tim OBrien, a Vietnam war veteran, is luring us into believing that these stories are true. By treating this work as a work of non-fiction, the reader sympathizes for the soldiers, and forms an emotional connection with the characters.In the chapter, Good Fo rm, OBrien tells you everything is made up. We, as readers, experience a sudden psychological change, and this change mirrors the psychological change the soldiers of the war experienced. We work out the stories differently now, and the soldiers were forced to view life and death differently. Notice in The Lives of the Dead, everyone in OBriens platoon shook hands with the perfectly Vietnam soldier, gave him a can of orange slices, and talked to him. In order to cope with the savageness of the war, these guys had to reanimate the dead. They had to see and treat him as if he was alleviate springy to relieve their guilty conscience of murder.After we realize these tales are just tales, we readers are forced view these stories through a different lens, and those boys who went to war had to see the war through the lens of soldier. Much like how surrogate Jimmy Cross was trained not to see his men as individuals, but rather as interchangeable units of command. OBriens well-educated setup allows the reader to experience to a certain degree how the soldiers entangle entering the war. If he just told us real stories, the happening truths, we would still empathize with them, but we wouldnt truly understand. This is why the story truth is sometimes truer, and more expressive than the happening truth.The Things They Carried is truly a considerable form of art, not only because of its stylistic language, but because it abandons tradition and blurs the line between fiction and non-fiction, creating brand new possibilities in the world of literature.